Placing Hefner, Imelda Marcos, and Hubbard in the Rings in Hell Based on Dantes Categories Free Essay Example, 1750 words

L. Ron Hubbard, a former science fiction writer, founded the Church of Scientology in 1954, which is based on dianetics, the study of the mind (Bentayou 16). Hubbard and his followers believe that man is an immortal being, inhabited by thetans, extraterrestrial spirits, [that] colonized humans 75 billion years ago (Bentayou 16). Through experiences like pain and suffering, man has forgotten his thetan self (McClare, Scientology: An Overview ). The main purpose of Scientology is to explain and help to perfect humans and their behavior through such practices as auditing that helps Scientologists deal with their engrams, which are traumatic experiences ingrained in man s subconscious, and harness their true potential (McClare, Scientology: An Overview ). Auditing is a paid service and is said to be very expensive (Bentayou 16). It seems that what Hubbard did then is that he created a business that preys on people s hunger for a religion that fits them. Although like other religions, Scientology has ethical foundations and principles, it is still one that is based on the premise that aliens inhabited human beings bodies. Furthermore, and what is most applicable here, is that Hubbard himself said that there was certainly something very corny about Heaven et al. , which translates into him denouncing God and Christ ( Operation Clambake Presents: Heaven ).We will write a custom essay sample on Placing Hefner, Imelda Marcos, and Hubbard in the Rings in Hell Based on Dantes Categories or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/page Hubbard would certainly fit in the sixth circle of hell, which consists of heretics, as who could be more blatant a heretic than Hubbard who claims that there is no God and that, in a sense, people descended from aliens.

What Challenges Did The Peacemakers At Vienna Face And How...

What challenges did the peacemakers at Vienna face and how effective were their solutions? Charles Stewart, half-brother to Castlereagh –the principle British diplomat to the Congress of Vienna wrote ‘if we consider the power of Russia†¦what may we not fear from her?’ in response to the situation of high tension created in the Congress of Vienna. The peacemakers at Vienna had two major aims; to main a ‘balance of power’ throughout Europe, and to prevent France from ever reaching the level of power it had held under Napoleon once again. In attempting to achieve these aims they faced a number of challenges; particularly territorial adjustments and divide amongst the Power Nations. Territorial reconstruction was the greatest challenge as it created a wedge between the nations, breaking them off into secretive alliances and pushed the congress to the brink of war. The peacemakers were also most effective in dealing with this challenge as the solutions absolved other challenges. The greatest challenge the peacemakers at Vienna faced was the reorganisation of Europe through the division of territory, as Jarret presents â€Å"the main issue confronting the allied statesmen at Vienna remained the reconstruction of central Europe, especially Poland† . The problem of territorial dispute was the greatest challenge as many of the great powers had personal land at risk but the balance of power had to be maintained, in particular through the Polish-Saxon negotiations. Prior to Napoleon’sShow MoreRelatedProject Mgmt296381 Words   |  1186 Pagesprospective project managers with the knowledge and skills that are transferable across industries and countries. Our motivation for writing this text was to provide students with a holistic, integrative view of project management. A holistic view focuses on how projects contribute to the strategic goals of the organization. The linkages for integration include the process of selecting projects that best support the strategy of a particular organization and that in turn can be supported by the technical and

Anthony Grafton and Bruno Latour may be considered as people of knowledge and education Essay Example For Students

Anthony Grafton and Bruno Latour may be considered as people of knowledge and education Essay Anthony Grafton and Bruno Latour may be considered as people of knowledge and education. They both were engaged in the process of knowledge acquiring and transforming it into their own ideas and new horizons of thought. For most aficionados, Princeton historian Anthony Grafton put the bon mot in play a few years ago in his elegant The Footnote: A Curious History Harvard University Press. Now, however, in The Devils Details: A History of Footnotes Invisible Cities Press, former Amherst College dean Chuck Zerby, in his odd doppelgÃÆ' ¤nger to Graftons volume, merely credits Grafton with reusing the line while stating see backhanded compliment at Zerby footnote No. 31, Grafton indicated that three other scholars have used the quip. That is, before Zerby made it four and your writer made it five. 1 But can we trust Zerby? His initial footnote to Graftons book, on Page 13, gives the publication date as 1999. By Page 55, the date reverts to 1997 the correct year, where it remains in subsequent citations. Is this the Devil teaching Zerby manners, befouling his own Grafton footnote as punishment for the authors daring, as a mere freelancer, to zap our leading footnote-ologist? Another Zerby aside, commenting on a purportedly inadequate Grafton citation Graftons annotation is not as fulsome as one might wish, suggests that less preternatural causes, like carelessness, prompt Zerbys error. But this aggressive proponent of a footrace within the historiography of the footnote does remind us that Graftons own crediting of the remark under whelms. The eminent Renaissance scholar points readers to a 1976 book, Cole Lesleys Remembered Laughter: The Life of Noel Coward, in which Coward attributed a stronger version of the remark to John Barrymore. 3 Any chance Barrymore stole it from Edwin Forrest? Grafton begins his search with what prove to be two straw men: the nineteenth-century German historian Leopold von Ranke and the late-eighteenth-century English historian Edward Gibbon, who share the reputation of having perfected modern historical scholarship. Despite Rankes impressive combination of narrative and analytical history and Gibbons blending of massive knowledge and high style, neither, according to Grafton, was the first to practice the art and craft of documented, critical history. Behind both were ancient, medieval, and Renaissance prototypes, numerous historians who not only told stories but cited evidence as well. Among them were the Italians Bernardino Corio, Leonardo Bruni, and Giannantonio Campano; the Englishmen Richard White and Ben Jonson; and, most impressively, the great French historian Jacques-Auguste de Thou. The latter wrote a genuinely new kind of history in what would prove to be the longest historical narrative before the twentieth century. 2 Other prototypes of modern scholarship included seventeenth-century church historians and antiquaries, particularly the German Jesuit Athanasius Kircher, whose massive, illustrated study of ancient China marked the maturation of a tradition of historical documentation reaching all the way back to the fourth-century Christian historian Eusebius and the venerable eighth-century English monk known as Bede. Here, too, one can find a combination of technical argument and deep documentation that anticipates modern historical scholarship. Also helping to make the primary source supreme within this tradition of scholarship were the bitter tracts of warring Protestants and Catholics. The seventeenth century was nonetheless a step up in historical scholarship because that centurys church historians and antiquaries, as well as exceptional scholars like de Thou, subjected documents to a higher degree of scrutiny, allowing the age of primitive accumulation of ecclesiastical-learning . . . to give way to one of analysis and investment. 4 However, Mr. Grafton again insists that the work of these scholars also provides an insufficient explanation for the rise of the footnote. So who, or what, in the end was the key player in the birth of the new professional scholarship the footnote came to represent? For Grafton, that honor belongs to a scholar and a work he first discovered as a college undergraduate: the great Dictionnaire of Pierre Bayle. Swarming with footnotes and irreverencies, and aspiring to expose and correct all the mistakes then existing in other reference books, Bayles dictionary is truly a young mans book. It was written against the background of the deconstruction of the scientific authority of the ancients at the hands of the new seventeenth-century scientists Rene Descartes, Francis Bacon, Blaise Pascal, and Robert Boyle. Here the modern rules of scholarly procedure and historical scholarship as we know them today finds their definitive statement. 3 Although Grafton proclaims Bayles uniqueness, he diminishes it somewhat by his extensive honor roll of earlier prototypes and by the revelation that Bayle was not, as the Germans like to say, always sauber he silently abridged and consciously or unconsciously misread texts. So, in the end, the hero of Graftons story turns out to be far from indisputable. If there is a failing in this very ambitious and informative little book, it is the absence of a discussion of what the rise of the footnote or modern scholarship has meant for the reading public outside the academy. Grafton writes about a very comfortable scholarly world that he obviously loves. The only discordant note he finds is arguably one only a scholar in such a position would take notice of and lament: the footnotes stylistic decline to a list of highly abbreviated archival citations. Statistics Project EssayAnd like Searle he knows something about intuitive and irrational reactions based upon thick and multifarious internal processing the mind that is inseparable from our bodily selves. 10 The intuitive, irrational, imaginative, whole human beingà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬ another category dismissed by poststructuralistsà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬ is the subject of the final and finest essay in the second half of the book, Martha Nussbaums The Literary Imagination in Public Life, a beautiful reading of Hard Times as a lesson in the wisdom that no public servant should be allowed to forget. Unlike any of the other writers, Nussbaum repeatedly uses the word life as the standard of truth and value try finding that word in any poststructuralist text!. Mr. Gradgrinds educational theories are bad because they are false to life; Dickenss novel is good because it offers a vision of life that includes reason and imagination, soul and body. Nussbaum, like Searle, comes from a field outside English: she is a professor of law and philosophy. Unlike the English professors whose essays make up the majority of Beyond Poststructuralism, these two have the courage to say that poststructuralism is wrong and that literature is rooted in life. Too many English professors have been listening so respectfully to such people as Bruno Letour and such theories as computo ergo sum that they have lost their nerve and acquiesced in the refusal of poststructuralism to acknowledge life as a meaningful term of value. Our whole profession should remember Paulinas words in The Winters Tale: Dear life redeems you. Dear life, our biological life on earth, must become the standard of truth if we are to redeem literary studies from post structuralism without relying on blind faith and miracles. Life is certainly a standard of value in Minutes of the Lead Pencil Club: Pulling the Plug on the Electronic Revolution, edited by Bill Henderson. This collection of essays, cartoons, poems, and snippets from newspapers is breezy and informal. The forty essays are all short, and as far as I can tell, none is by a literary critic. Poets and essayistsà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬ Gary Snyder and Wendell Berryà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬ contribute; so do the humorists Russell Baker and Dave Barry and the novelists E. Annie Proulx and John Updike. The book has one clear theme: enslavement to computers is taking us out of the natural world, away from face-to-face and voice-to-voice connections with our friends and our families. Some of the essays also decry the expense of computers, the planned obsolescence that forces people to keep buying upgrades so that they will not be stuck with unusable machines. More clearly than anyone else Wendell Berry warns that computers are one more link between us and the power companies that are destroying the earth for their own profit. Mark Sloukas Rapture and Redemption in the Virtual World is about the mad millennialism of those devotees of computers who proudly announce their imminent freedom from the body. He does not mention Bruno Letour, but Letour is one of their number. Slouka includes horrifying quotations from other famous professors Michael Benedikt, Bruce Mazlish about the promise of freedom from the ballast of materiality, the possibility of being angels, if not God in virtual reality. The recent mass suicide of the Heavens Gate cult of computer programmers demonstrates that what sounds like harmless lunacy in people like Bruno Latour is in fact deadly. When people start believing computo ergo sum, their minds are open to all demons. 8 /p The disdain for the biological world in poststructuralist theory and the disdain for physical labor that is part of the worship of computers cannot be separated. The supercilious contempt that poststructuralists feel for people who still believe a real world exists is only the most extreme and absurd version of the contempt that white-collar workers have felt for blue-collar workers and farmers ever since the Renaissance. Noxious plants with deep roots are very hard to kill; well-intentioned but half-hearted criticism of post structuralism and computers is not going to be enough. We need a deeper criticism of the falsehoods in our culture, a stronger knowledge that the reality of our life on earth must be the test of truth than the books by Goodheart, Harris, and Henderson offer. But this criticism and this knowledge do not depend on some great intellectual breakthrough, some yet undiscovered insight. If we could once again take literature seriously we would not have to look any further than As You Like It and The Winters Tale, where the rich are forced to remember that their life depends on the poor who grow their food, that only fools and tyrants feel contempt for shepherds. If we can truly believe that the selfsame sun that shines upon Bill Gatess court hides not his visage from a cottage in Bangladesh, then dear life can indeed redeem us.

Assignment #8 Essays - Corporate Law, Management, Board Of Directors

Write an essay (750 word minimum) answering these questions. What is the main point or thesis the author is arguing for? What are the reasons given to support the main thesis? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the authors argument? In what ways do you agree and/or disagree with the author? A student might also write about the underlying assumptions of the authors argument or the unstated implications of the ideas presented. Students are encouraged to develop their own points of view on these issues but need to clearly and fairly state the authors position first. The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits by Milton Friedman The New York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970. Copyright @ 1970 by The New York Times Company. When I hear businessmen speak eloquently about the "social responsibilities of business in a free-enterprise system," I am reminded of the wonderful line about the Frenchman who discovered at the age of 70 that he had been speaking prose all his life. The businessmen believe that they are defending free enterprise when they declaim that business is not concerned "merely" with profit but also with promoting desirable "social" ends; that business has a "social conscience" and takes seriously its responsibilities for providing employment, eliminating discrimination, avoiding pollution and whatever else may be the catchwords of the contemporary crop of reformers. In fact they areor would be if they or anyone else took them seriouslypreaching pure and unadulterated socialism. Businessmen who talk this way are unwitting puppets of the intellectual forces that have been undermining the basis of a free society these past decades. The discussions of the "social responsibilities of business" are notable for their analytical looseness and lack of rigor. What does it mean to say that "business" has responsibilities? Only people can have responsibilities. A corporation is an artificial person and in this sense may have artificial responsibilities, but "business" as a whole cannot be said to have responsibilities, even in this vague sense. The first step toward clarity in examining the doctrine of the social responsibility of business is to ask precisely what it implies for whom. Presumably, the individuals who are to be responsible are businessmen, which means individual proprietors or corporate executives. Most of the discussion of social responsibility is directed at corporations, so in what follows I shall mostly neglect the individual proprietors and speak of corporate executives. In a free-enterprise, private-property system, a corporate executive is an employee of the owners of the business. He has direct responsibility to his employers. That responsibility is to conduct the business in accordance with their desires, which generally will be to make as much money as possible while conforming to the basic rules of the society, both those embodied in law and those embodied in ethical custom. Of course, in some cases his employers may have a different objective. A group of persons might establish a corporation for an eleemosynary purposefor example, a hospital or a school. The manager of such a corporation will not have money profit as his objective but the rendering of certain services. In either case, the key point is that, in his capacity as a corporate executive, the manager is the agent of the individuals who own the corporation or establish the eleemosynary institution, and his primary responsibility is to them. Needless to say, this does not mean that it is easy to judge how well he is performing his task. But at least the criterion of performance is straightforward, and the persons among whom a voluntary contractual arrangement exists are clearly defined. Of course, the corporate executive is also a person in his own right. As a person, he may have many other responsibilities that he recognizes or assumes voluntarilyto his family, his conscience, his feelings of charity, his church, his clubs, his city, his country. He ma}. feel impelled by these responsibilities to devote part of his income to causes he regards as worthy, to refuse to work for particular corporations, even to leave his job, for example, to join his country's armed forces. Ifwe wish, we may refer to some of these responsibilities as "social responsibilities." But in these respects he is acting

Dactylic Hexameter

Dactylic Hexameter Dactylic Hexameter is a very important meter in Greek and Latin poetry. It is especially associated with epic poetry, and so is referred to as heroic. The very words dactylic hexameter often stand for epic poetry. Why Dactyl? Dactyl is the Greek for finger. [Note: The Homeric epithet for the goddess Eos (Dawn) is rhododactylos or rosy-fingered.] There are 3 phalanges in a finger and, likewise, there are 3 parts of a dactyl. Presumably, the first phalanx is the longest in the ideal finger, while the others are shorter and about the same length, since long, short, short is the form of the dactyl foot. The phalanges here refer to the syllables; thus, there is a long syllable, followed by two short ones, at least in the basic form. Technically, a short syllable is one mora and a long is two morae in length of time. Since the meter in question is dactylic hexameter, there are 6 sets of the dactyls. The dactylic foot is formed with one long followed by two short syllables. This may be represented with a long mark (for example, the underscore symbol _) followed by two short marks (e.g., U). Put together a dactylic foot can be written as _UU. Since were discussing dactylic hexameter, a line of poetry written in dactylic hexameter could be written like this:_UU_UU_UU_UU_UU_UU. If you count, youll see 6 underscores and 12 Us, making up six feet. However, dactylic hexameter lines can also be composed using substitutions for the dactyls. (Remember: The dactyl, as stated above, is one long and two short or, converted to morae, 4 morae.) A long is two morae, so a dactyl, which is the equivalent of two longs, is four morae long. Thus, the meter known as spondee (represented as two underscores: _ _), which is also the equivalent of 4 morae, can substitute for a dactyl. In this case, there would be two syllables and both would be long, rather than three syllables. In contrast with the other five feet, the last foot of the line of dactylic hexameter is usually not a dactyl. It may be a spondee (_ _) or a shortened spondee, with only 3 morae. In a shortened spondee, there would be two syllables, the first long and the second short (_ U). In addition to the actual form of the line of the dactylic hexameter, there are various conventions about where substitutions are likely and where word and syllable breaks should occur [see caesura and diaresis]. Dactylic hexameter describes Homeric epic meter (Iliad and Odyssey) and that of Vergils (Aeneid). It is also used in shorter poetry. In (Yale U Press, 1988), Sara Mack discusses Ovids 2 meters, dactylic hexameter and elegiac couplets. Ovid uses the dactylic hexameter for his Metamorphoses. Mack describes a metrical foot as like a whole note, the long syllable as like a half note and the short syllables as like quarter notes. This (half note, quarter note, quarter note) seems a very useful description for understanding a dactylic foot.

Research paper about Pitney Bowes Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

About Pitney Bowes - Research Paper Example As a leader in the provision of software and hardware capabilities relating to information, the organization faces the need to institute new and improved ways of operations in order to realize its objectives. The organizational development plan, therefore, seeks to shed light on some of the most critical areas of action in addition to offering the new strategies that should be adopted by the organization in order to realize these transformations. Introduction and scope of the plan The major purpose of this organizational development plan is to bring about change and transformation at Pitney Bowes and improve the performance of the organization in the various sectors, as spelled in this plan. Specifically, the plan seeks to enable the organization to realize its objectives as spelled out in the strategic plan, achieve its vision and to transform the overall performance of the organization towards the better. In the context of managing mails, the company seeks to revolutionize the indu stry, as it has always done. More importantly, the plan seeks to ensure that the organization lives up to its mission statement of delivering shareholder and customer value through the provision of quality services in the market. Essentially, this is a document geared towards steering the development of the organization taking consideration of the fact that the present business environment has become almost uncertain and, hence, organizations must always strive to achieve and deliver the best in the market (Pederson, 2010). The plan will further monitor the realization of these goals through a systematic process that links up to the very expectations of the clients and other stakeholders of the organization. The plan is anchored on the Pitney Bowes organizational culture which stresses on the empowerment of staff and building the confidence of the organization’s customers scattered across the world (Lusterman, 2001). It s important to realize that any tangible organizational success can only be realized if the strategies and objectives of the organization are spelled out well and understood by all stakeholders. Everybody should be in the capacity to clearly understand their duties and roles towards the overall development of the organization. Background Pitney Bowes has always pursued a range of activities geared towards the development of the organization since its formation (2006). Much of these changes have always revolved around the establishment of a proper organizational structure that can ensure easy management and decision making. In addition, globalization and the new options brought about by technology have compelled the organization to radically transform its operations in order to comply with these demands of time. This is realized in the areas of research, development and technology where huge investments have been made in the recent past in order to improve operations and facilitate global operations. Indeed, the organization development p lan presents a good basis for the organization to effectively coordinate its operations and manage its increasing affairs across the world. The concept of organizational development is no longer a conventional affair in the business world. It requires proper strategies and sufficient resource allocations in order to succeed. Pitney Bowes has always been a leading provider of services and products in communication across

Arsenal Football Club Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Arsenal Football Club - Coursework Example Historical Record of Arsenal Football Club The financial performance of Arsenal Football Club was quite strong in the year 2010 and the club has also experienced significant drop of debt. From the historical viewpoint, the earnings of Arsenal Football Club have fluctuated. In the year 2001, the club had a profit of almost 24.3 million Pounds but in the subsequent year the club experienced loss of 20.5 million Pounds. The reason of loss in that financial year was rise in wages due to growth in the number of players (London Business School, 2009). Since initiation the club’s group turnover has progressed gradually. In the year 2005, the group turnover of Arsenal Football club was almost 138.4 million Pounds which had become more than double by 2010 to almost 379.9 million Pounds. The club also experienced growth of operating profit in that period. The low sales in the property development business were the main reason for decreasing operating profit in 2006. Arsenal Football Club operates in two prominent segments which are football and property development. Since the operating loss in the year 2006, the football segment has shown increased growth. In the year 2007, the turnover of football segment was almost 207.7 million Euros which had become 229.9 million Euros in 2009. The increase was generally motivated by new television series. In the year 2010, almost nineteen â€Å"Barclays Premier League†, 4 â€Å"UEFA Champion League†, 3 â€Å"FA Cup† and 2 â€Å"Carling Cup† matches were telecasted. The revenue of football segment mostly comes from the sales of tickets. The Emirates Stadium of Arsenal Football Club also hosted two international friendly matches (Arsenal Holdings PLC, 2007; Arsenal Holdings PLC, 2010). ... Arsenal Football Club operates in two prominent segments which are football and property development. Since the operating loss in the year 2006, the football segment has shown increased growth. In the year 2007, the turnover of football segment was almost 207.7 million Euros which had become 229.9 million Euros in 2009. The increase was generally motivated by new television series. In the year 2010, almost nineteen â€Å"Barclays Premier League†, 4 â€Å"UEFA Champion League†, 3 â€Å"FA Cup† and 2 â€Å"Carling Cup† matches were telecasted. The revenue of football segment mostly comes from the sales of tickets. The Emirates Stadium of Arsenal Football Club also hosted two international friendly matches (Arsenal Holdings PLC, 2007; Arsenal Holdings PLC, 2010). Source: (Arsenal Holdings PLC, 2005; Arsenal Holdings PLC, 2010) Property development is the other section from which Arsenal Football Club generates profits. In the year 2005, the company experience d low activity in property development business. The total turnover during the year was 23.3 million Pounds which was 44% lesser compared to 2004. In 2006, the turnover of property development business had increased to 23.8 million Pounds which was 4.6 times more compared to previous year. The reason for this increase in turnover was due to sale of ‘Drayton Park’, one of the expansion sites of Arsenal Football Club. In the year 2008, the returns of property development business had again reduced to 15.3 million Pounds, because the sales activity was restricted by the yielding leasehold interests and constricting operations within the communal housing component. In 2009–2010, Arsenal Football Club had seen extreme